Unexpected Displeasures

When I first heard about an upcoming contemporary jewellery exhibition at the NGV international, I was very excited. I visited Unexpected Pleasures very early in the season, but only had 15 minutes spare to view it. A quick whiz around left me feeling distinctly underwhelmed, but I optimistically put that down to the rush I was in. So I went back on the last weekend. Again I was disappointed.

I love jewellery in all its contexts: historically, culturally, intellectually, aesthetically – or so I believed. I love to wear it, if it is interesting, humorous or merely beautiful. I don’t shy away from the bold, the strange or enormous. But there still needs to be something that engages me beyond a moment – however intellectual that moment might be. And call me a wimp, but I don’t want to wear something that might cut my throat, or take out the eye of my companion.

 And call me a wimp, but I don’t want to wear something that might cut my throat, or take out the eye of my companion.

Bottlenecklace by Bernhard Schobinger, broken bottlenecks, metal cord, 1988. The designer dug these up from a former luxury hotel rubbish tip.Pleated Collar by Paul Derrez, plastic and steel, 1982. Simple folded pleats frame the face in a manner reminiscent of the seventeenth century ruffs of Dutch dress.

Frozen by Suzanne Klemm, polyolefin, 2007. Frozen sings an ode to the immortality of nature.Beauty Gallery: Suzy, Gina, Kiki, Andrea, Uschi, Sabbine, by Otto Künzli, cibachrome colour prints, 1984.Necklace/Veil by Caroline Broadhead, nylon, 1983. Radical and challenging, the Veil’s flexibility bestows wearability. 

In point of fact, the exhibition is not a celebration of aesthetically appealing adornment – instead it challenges this viewpoint and ‘looks instead at the essential meanings of jewellery … from the point of view of the wearer as well as the maker. Contemporary Jewellery in this sense is at the intersection of art and design.’ [Exhibition summary] I posit that these designers did not consider the wearer (see above comments re cutting throats), albeit they did pose questions about the nature of jewellery. Yet if this is art, it engaged me only momentarily before I scuttled along to the next display. The questions and their answers did not seem terribly profound.

Perhaps I am too frivolous, but when it comes to wearable art, I like my intellect to be wrapped up in pretty packaging. Presumably many of these jewelers would be making commercial pieces – it would have been extremely interesting to compare them with these more esoteric explorations.

Beach Brooches by Helen Aitken-Kuhnen, sterling silver, enamel, stainless steel, 2011, take on an aspect of alchemy in their making.MEGA 1/7 by Camilla Prasch, red dyed snap fastners, nylon thread, silicone disks, 2009. This voluptuous ring comes alive as it follows the movements of its wearer.Wallpaper brooches by Otto Künzli, wallpaper, synthetic polymer core, steel, 1982. Distinctly similar to wood, these brooches are abstract, architectural and wearable.

Room – note the almost invisible mausoleum in the centreThe exhibition design was interesting and elegant however, with a mirrored oblong in the centre of the room (somewhat reminiscent of a mausoleum) – I’m not sure on the selection criteria required on the part of the work chosen to be so honoured. In addition, on a technological note, I really missed not having access to an app catalogue, as I did at the Love Lace exhibition at the Powerhouse Museum in Sydney earlier this year. QR codes at each display case accessed the relevant catlogue entry. It was a great reference before and after I actually viewed the show. 

Upon leaving the exhibition I felt very worthy for having seen it, but was still vaguely unsatisfied. It was a bit like ploughing through a bowl of spinach when you really just want a chocolate éclair.

Unexpected Pleasures has now closed.

Bracelet, necklace by Nel Linssen, coated paper, elastic thread, 2008/2009. An endless stack of paper discs is transformed into three dimensions.Trans-Hematopoietic Neckpiece by Doug Bucci, acrylic photo polymer. A diabetic, Bucci used 3D printing to fabricate a neckpiece that reflects the patterns of blood sugar in his body. Now, I'm hypoglycaemic myself, and I am compelled to remark that although the form is pleasing, the inspiration is somewhat repellent.Brooch with Four Eyes by Adam paxon, acrylic, lacquer, enamel, 2009. Very reminiscent of glass lampwork, this fleshy brooch is appealingly tactile.Heart by Otto Künzli, hard foam, lacquer, 1985. This large, shiny brooch bears some resemblance in its simplicity to Künzli’s wallpaper brooches.

Knitted Hearts by Iris Eichenberg, wool, 1993–2007. Literal interpretations of the aorta ripped from the chest: a violence softened by cuddly wool. In Memoriam I, Mourning II by Constanze Schreiber, fine silver, 2006. In Memoriam I embodies the sense of loss of a loved one through the memento mori of a skull; Mourning II hints at putrefaction and decay. Heart Speaking by Bruce Metcalf, wood, gold-plated brass, 2011. Turned on its side, this heart spews forth vitriol rather than whispering sweet nothings.

Previous
Previous

Not for Wallflowers

Next
Next

Didn’t We Have A Lovely Day?